I will pay for the following essay Aztec Well Servicing Company. The essay is to be 1 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.
As much as Aztec company failed to conform to the laws, the employees failed to proof. The evidence provided was not sufficient to proof that the time spent during travelling was part of the job. The different crews showed inconsistency in the activities they did during travel time. In addition, the activities done during the travelling time were preliminary to the actual job the plaintiffs had been employed to do. There complaint shows no specificity on the amount of time spent to discuss work related issues during the travel. The claimants failed to include some of their grievances in their initial complaint (Mataya, 2005. Hickox, 2006).
The plaintiffs also failed to totally proof that the work they performed during the travelling was meant to benefit the employee like the FLSA Act demands. The training was for their own benefit as it was in favour of their safety (Nayab, 2010).
In my opinion, the portal-to-portal act is biased and is liable work against employees who may not be well informed. It is quite unfair to define the several hour spent travelling and doing some work related activities like in the case of Aztec employees as ordinary travel (Mataya,
